This morning, I came across an interesting article on Google Plus. All along, I have come across the regular and usual comments about the newly introduced products from the owners and the definitions about how their new innovations could "CHANGE" the world.
Google+ is no different too. Google claims that the Google+ is the fast forward looking approach and the Google itself is getting "TRANSMOGRIFIED" into Google+ soon. And on the same line, infact Google projected google+'s advancement and promoting the same to the incentives to the top Google leadership. However, it was little surprising to NOTE that this message DID NOT get conveyed properly as the the following article talks about how minimal the TOP management of Google uses its own product, GOOGLE+.
No wonder the article had the title "If Google's Management doesn’t use Google+, then why should you?"
Proceed ahead on finding this interesting visual explanation about how much the TOTAL usage found by its own management folk of Google+.
Given below is the Techgig.com's page snapshot:
I say the article title as "If Google's Management doesn’t use Google+, then why should you?" is correct.
Google+ is no different too. Google claims that the Google+ is the fast forward looking approach and the Google itself is getting "TRANSMOGRIFIED" into Google+ soon. And on the same line, infact Google projected google+'s advancement and promoting the same to the incentives to the top Google leadership. However, it was little surprising to NOTE that this message DID NOT get conveyed properly as the the following article talks about how minimal the TOP management of Google uses its own product, GOOGLE+.
No wonder the article had the title "If Google's Management doesn’t use Google+, then why should you?"
Proceed ahead on finding this interesting visual explanation about how much the TOTAL usage found by its own management folk of Google+.
Given below is the Techgig.com's page snapshot:
I say the article title as "If Google's Management doesn’t use Google+, then why should you?" is correct.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Please let me know your inputs/feedback on this blog post: